Yesterday was the day when i crashed 2 lectures in NUS, heard 2 diff cheena lecturers drone on abt their stuff, and doodle on my notebook... Not that its nt interesting, it was... Maybe i wasnt too used to studying after so long? Or it could juz be them...
Anyway, i thought psycho was such an interesting topic.. At least the lecture on trauma was... The lecturer was somewhat hilarious, other than the part that she didnt meant it to be funny... She said tons of interesting stuff, like how learning abt trauma is traumatic.. At this point, i seriously believed her, coz this lecture abt trauma was definitely a traumatic exp.. Not that she meant it that way of coz... Also, she talks like she had tons of exp with the topic, which was supposed to be expected... But she sounds positively traumatic, like she is really suffering frm the disorders she was talking abt... U know, being easily irritable, thinking back abt past events that shook her life, etc la....
Mr MuTong wasnt much better... He's also cheena, also says jokes without realising, except his was boring.. His slides no pictures one.. And he loves dark places, or he juz wants to save electricity and Gaia... Anyway, that CAM lecture was so much on stats that the only thing i ever absorbed was MuTong... Yes, juz this 2 words....
Conclusion? Cheena teachers like to go out of point.... Like REALLY out.... Once they start on a certain topic that they like (for e.g., traumatic events like an accident in NUS, or the syllabus of TCM in china), they start pouring out grandfather/mother stories and get totally off track... Now that's really traumatic... =)
No comments:
Post a Comment